GLOBALIZATION NEEDS REINVIGORATION PART 3 – 2022 JANUARY

by Mimi Sia

GLOBALIZATION NEEDS REINVIGORATION
PART 3

2022 JANUARY ISSUE

By : Andrew Sia

Introduction

Courtesy of: gbnews.ch

Retailers are counting on a vibrant holiday season and are predicting an increase of 8.3% year-on-year but it is now being threatened by short-supplies of the most sought-after products. And like every threat, people are looking for the scape goat, and this time the breakdown of the global retail supply chain will be to blame.

Looking back at the holiday season of 2020 where the consumers were not confident to shop, and the arrival of the spring 2021 collection arrived at the stores in the midst of the coronavirus, the goods started to pile up. The retailers used the holiday season of 2021 to unload their inventory to the consumers and we have heard the complain of the lack of freshness during the time.

But during 2020 we saw the weaknesses in the supply chain and many of those challenges were never seen before. Starting with the raw material cost which has been increased, then the shipping cost with the container ship, Ever Given, strained in the Suez Canal, caused the contain ship-jam triggered the rising of the cost. The congestions at the different seaports, caused further delay and jacked up shipping cost. Lately, with the covid cases at the major seaports in China, pushed back the shipments. I have been using an expression that, it doesn’t rain but it pours, to describe the situation.

It is easy to say that the supply chain has not been optimized as over the last twenty years the industry has been pushed by the growing demand, and as the result everyone was doing the catching up. Who would have thought for a situation that we are facing today, not to mention that actually we have a multiple situations to deal with. In business school we talked about risk management based on different scenarios, but our supply chain was built so effectively and who would have thought that it would fail one day? 

In general the product sourcing was led by the low-cost, price-driven perspective and companies were looking for the cheapest price. The market was full of deals for the last ten years. The low cost drove up the high volume and it was a vicious circle that has been haunting us for the past two years.

What was emphasized as “on-time” delivery is no longer a reality now, although the specialists said that it still accounted for 38% of the business. I would be very shrewd to say that it simply doesn’t exist. One thing I know that the freight cost has escalated to six, seven times, and the worst I have heard is ten times.

And due to the sourcing of goods, the buyers have moved from China to other lower-cost countries in Asia. Whether you like China or not, you need to understand that the country, over the last forty years, has developed the most complete, and you can even say that the most advanced supply chain for the textile materials. The other Asian countries can only provide the stitching at the lower cost-per-minute. They have no infrastructure and they are lack of business strategy. For these Asian countries they have no means for any major investment and lack of the foresight for technology that can carry them in the years ahead. If those fabrics and components are stopped from shipping from China, they have to depend on their own textile industry that are either in those very early days—old, fragile and ineffective, or at their infant stage. Their entire production will grind to a halt. 

Today’s China is not going to sit and watch the developed world to move away their business, in this case, their cheese, but to open sewing plants in Bangladesh, Cambodia, Vietnam, to take advantage of the lower minimum wages. They can play around with their costing structure and between China and the developing countries to strike a balance and will still remain in business for the many years to come.

And besides, not to forget that it has a very large domestic market where they can serve with their products as well. In many ways, China is still the winner and the buying offices know about all the options and they are playing along to the song book to remain in business.

Not to say that the developed countries are without challenge during the pandemic. After the shipments are unloaded at the ports, they will need to be distributed fast enough to the retailers, and guess what? We are in the trucking crisis!

It has now come to our knowledge that the trucking industry has been severely lacked of the truck drivers, but it has also reached the breaking point because of the pandemic. Earlier on, we noticed that many of the drivers were contaminated by the covid that put a lot of them out of service.

In 2019’s report from the American Trucking Associations, the industry was short of 61,000 drivers in 2018 already. We can see that it was an old problem. In 2020, some two million workers were hired as long-haul truck drivers according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This high number of hiring is showing the jobless situation in the US is severe and it has moved people to be trained as truck drivers. Having said that, it is predicted that there will still be openings for some 231,100 new truck drivers each year for the foreseeable future.

Our problem with the retailers do not stop with the global supply chain, but the calling for the retailers to transit their operations from a primary physical retailer—bricks and mortar, to a digital e-commerce model. Although the writing was on the wall and yet it took them a long time to migrate. Now with the covid, what would take previously five years to make the change, can happen now in one year. This is the time if you don’t change, you won’t be able to survive.

To run the retail store business side by side with the online business where some thorough procedures would need to map out. We need to know that these are fundamentally different operating models. The demand for both businesses are still in their infant stage, especially during this time of the covid. Considerations of supply and demand, and pricing structures are very different. To have a profitable business will need a lot of tweaking before you can say that it is successful.

Consumers are also looking at the two business formats differently. Their shopping behavior will have to reestablish as probably many of them would have changed their lifestyle already after spending nearly two years under the pandemic.

Already that the retail business is depending heavily on the fourth quarter of the year, in fact more than 60% of their business are made in this quarter, and also in the holiday season they can sell higher ticket products. I don’t know if many of them would have found it difficult for them to last until next year if they continue to miss the numbers for this yearend.

Lately, there have been a lot of talks about paying attention to their business for lowering the carbon emissions, use the recycle materials and go for their practices in sustainability. Paying attention to the supply chain will drive a lot of them out of business as it is a goal that no one can achieve under this adverse situation.

Supply Chain is Becoming Demand Chain

Courtesy of: intracen.org

Uncertainty and disruption is becoming new normal under this pandemic. Successive lockdowns have accelerated radical shifts in fashion’s business model and to recalibrate its supply chain will become very important.

Suppliers typically operate on a lead time of 90 to 120 days. But under the current situation with the pandemic and the outbreak of the new variants, the retailers are very shaky when placing new orders. The lockdown is still ongoing in major markets.

We have read that by July of last year, about 400 manufacturers closed their operations in Cambodia, In Bangladesh, the world’s second biggest garment exporter after China, 348 factories closed between March and April 2020. The order level compared to last year is down by 30%.

In order to remain in business, it is not unheard of that manufacturers have accepted orders below cost since the pandemic started. It is to keep the operation going and not to lose the skillful labors. The factory operators would in return squeeze the workers for the labor costs and the situation can get from bad to worse as it can create the humanitarian crisis.

The garment is using predominantly female workforce and it is already an industry that is less formalized, even more exploitative form of employment, it has worsened the female labor’s working condition.

The apparel industry has been moving away from the wholesalers who used to hold the stock and inventory for the retailers.  But in recent year the retailers tend to go direct and place their business with the manufacturers. There is one very important buffer going away.

With the emerging of the tech companies, the introduction of the ultra-fast, online fashion business that makes the retailers look clumsy, and certainly inefficient. Orders are in nibble-size and e-commerce emphasize in a test-and-repeat business model. Their order minimum is a nightmare to the manufacturers who have to haggle with their fabrics and trims suppliers, and it is not just the order minimum but also the color minimum. It is becoming a very costly operation before you can get the production off the ground.

The reorder will only happen when the test order has proved to be successful. And then the nightmare will start all over again.

For countries who don’t have the complete supply chain, I mean those with the upstream in fabric and trim production, by only providing CMT is inadequate, and this can make countries like Bangladesh, Vietnam and Cambodia, extremely difficult to survive. This can mean longer lead time and higher order minimum, and when everything was “yesterday” it can make the negotiation almost impossible.

The labor is also another part that can be very difficult to handle, in some days the factory can find itself with too many workers but not enough order loading for it to produce. And in other days, the loading can become overloaded when the deliveries are all required at the same time.

In this time, there are many factories being closed because of the cost-effectiveness and the efficiency and normally those factories who have been around for a longer time with the labors who are no longer young anymore will need to be replaced.

Even if China has been caught in the trade war, but China is indispensable as it has the most completed supply chain from all kinds of trims, zippers, threads, and you name it, China is well equipped with it. China is also known for knowing how to get around its cost even if it has the highest labor cost in that region.

Bangladesh and the countries can’t get fully self-sufficient as they have no knowledge of textiles.

Globalization Needs Technology and New Ideas

Courtesy of: suppplychaindigital.com

Global pandemic has locked the economy down and break our supply chain. You may say that this consequence was unexpected and yet because it is still far from over, many challenges would remain until we can figure out what to expect when things can be “normalized”.

First of all, we need to find out what the consumers want as in the meantime they have went through a lot of challenges as well. Their shifting to online shopping has certainly become a norm and it is not just clothing, but also the groceries and the other essentials. They will be moving more and move towards the online shopping and because of the convenient and the habit, they will not come back to the bricks and mortar like before.

Without knowing, technology has creeped into the system, artificial intelligence is beginning to drive both strategic and structural transformation of retail. It is starting to learn the consumer’s preferences and habits and based on what it has picked up, is trying to build the portfolio and start to streaming products to the consumer’s attention. With the data collected it can optimize its inventory and increase the productivity based on the analytics.

The business will know what to stock and where to get the supply in the timely manner. This can also optimize the sizes and the numbers of the stores in order to serve the business better. And the bigger of the company can have the better resource to expand in this technological area. The engagement of the tech giants in this is indispensable as they are already ahead of everyone and to engage them is going to help tremendously than to reinvent for this business format.

We are beginning to see the companies going into one another, for instance we read that Toy ‘R’ Us is in Macy’s, Top Shop can be found in Nordstrom’s, Sephora and Amazon is operating in Kohl’s, Ulta is in Target. And more will take place. This is bigger than the shop-in-shop concept that we know of. This is in a bigger scale and is more committed. And all this is to bring the convenience to the consumers. 

An Overview of the Shipping Industry

Courtesy of: supplychainbeyond.com

As aforesaid that this pandemic has already lasted for two years and it is entering into its third year. Unfortunately we can still see that the shipping industry is still in a gridlock. Nothing has improved and I am mentioning in the last part, the new variant, omicron, is going to cause more closedowns along the whole supply chain as well as it will further affect the retailers.

First of all, we can see the fright rates are still surging, and not only it is still going up but the shipping lines are beginning to choose for what to ship. Obviously it is for applying a higher charge and that have left the farmers for the dairy products being refused for taking their shipments to Southeast Asia and Mexico for instance.

The shipping companies have found that they can charge more by import shipments from Asia to the United States and they applied an attitude to unload the shipments on the West Coast and depart immediately back to Asia for taking another new shipment. They realized that they can charge $18,730 per container from Asia to the West Coast which is 17-times what it can charge to make the reverse trip. And because of this, more than 80% of the containers export out of the Port of Los Angeles in September were empty.

The shipping companies went through a price war in the last ten years and in order to get more ship loading, they slashed the freight rate. And after the fierce competition, the five big shipping companies went into merging and consolidation and ended with the listing as the following.

  1. Moller-Maersk with 4.1 million TEU
  2. Mediterranean Shipping Company with 3.8 million TEU
  3. COSCO Shipping Lines with 3.1 million TEU
  4. CMA CGM Group with 2.7 million TEU
  5. Hapag-Lloyd with 1.7 million TEU

Recently, the U.S. shippers complained that the leading shipping lines had colluded over pricing and denial of the U.S. export shipments to expedite repositioning empty containers to the Far East. Likewise the European Commission had the same complain over some difficulty in resolving the shipping crisis.

Without doubts that these two years have been the best years for the shipping lines as they have announced record profits.

All the ports will continue its congestion as they have all reached their capacity. The queueing for the unload of containers is going to continue, and it is ranging from 7 days to 14 days. The ports are already working on 24-hours, although some on Saturdays as well. But the consignees, warehouses and offices are not working on weekends. 

The problem has intensified with the shortage of drivers, this is not only in the U.S., but also the European Unions and the United Kingdom.

The shipping lines are investing in “superjumbo” vessels, and 30 of the colossal vessels are expected to deliver in 2023 and each is with the capacity above 21,000 TEU.

In the Drewry’s latest Global Container Terminal Operators Annual Review and Forecast Report it indicated the global container port will increase by an average 2.5% per year to reach 1.3 billion TEU in 2025. The global demand is set to rise by an average of 5% per annum. The ports average utilization rates will increase from the current 67% to over 75%.

We have to understand that for the port expansion it is very difficult because the return of investment is not attractive and environmental factors are big obstacles. This has already driven some smaller shipping companies out of business.

If the container ports are too near to the urban areas, they will limit the growth potentials. If it is out of the way, consideration of investments for infrastructure, such as highway, railway, and other supports are very much lagging behind.

The turnaround time for the empty containers was usually at around 90 days, but it is now extended to 180 days. Total number of containers in circulation is estimated to be 45 million containers. And because the circulation is extended by double, the shortage of the containers is also in the range of 45 million containers.

The world is depending to China for the production of containers and the yearly output is around 5 million containers. At the present pace, it will take nine years to produce sufficient containers to meet the current condition.

The cost of airfreight has gone up as well. Last year the charter flight cost was $600,000 and now it is $2 million. It is about $13 per kilo.

Our future still look very bleak and until we can get out from this pandemic, for whatever we are doing is still very dismal.    

You may also like